Key result
Multicenter HINODE registry establishes real-world device effectiveness and mortality benchmarks in Japanese heart failure patients.
Why the study?
Randomized trials demonstrate prophylactic ICD therapy reduces mortality in HF with reduced LVEF, but the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in Japanese HF patients with similar risk factors remains unknown.
Does primary prevention with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or CRT-D devices reduce life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in Japanese patients with heart failure compared to non-device therapy?
Cohort (n=443)
Yes
Does primary prevention with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or CRT-D devices reduce life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in Japanese patients with heart failure compared to non-device therapy?
The HINODE study design provides a prospective framework to clarify the incidence of sudden cardiac death and the therapeutic impact of primary prevention defibrillators in Japanese heart failure patients.
BACKGROUND: Randomized trials in Western countries have provided evidence that prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy reduces mortality in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. However, the risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in Japanese HF patients sharing similar risk factors is still unknown. METHODS: The Heart Failure Indication and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial Japan trial (NCT03185832) is a prospective, multicenter registry designed to collect data on ventricular arrhythmia, HF events, and mortality in Japanese HF patients. Japanese patients with HF and 2-5 predefined risk factors who were indicated for cardiac device implantation based on European Society of Cardiology guidelines were enrolled in four treatment arms: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D), HF pacing (PA; Pacemaker and cardiac resynchronization pacemaker), and nondevice (ND) cohorts and followed for a minimum of 12 months. Since it is anticipated that some baseline patient characteristics and risk factors will differ significantly from those reported in predominantly Western populations, event rates will be compared to a propensity-matched population from the MADIT RIT trial. Primary endpoints are composite rates of first appropriately treated ventricular arrhythmias (VA) or/and life-threatening VA symptoms for the ICD and CRT-D cohorts. For nondevice and PA cohorts, the primary outcome is all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The Heart Failure Indication and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial Japan is a large prospective multicenter registry with defined device treatment cohorts and will provide data for risk stratification for cardiovascular events in Japanese HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamasaki et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure (n=443). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) vs. Non-device cohort or heart failure pacing (PA) cohort was evaluated on Composite rate of first appropriately treated ventricular arrhythmias or life-threatening VA symptoms (for ICD and CRT-D cohorts); all-cause mortality (for nondevice and PA cohorts). The HINODE study is a prospective multicenter registry designed to evaluate cardiovascular outcomes and device effectiveness across device and non-device cohorts in Japanese patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: