Key result
Maintenance hemodialysis patients had significantly reduced global longitudinal strain (-15.07% vs -20.55%, p<0.001) and increased peak strain dispersion compared to healthy controls.
Why the study?
The study investigated the value of layer-specific strain analysis by 2D-STE for evaluating left ventricular systolic function and synchrony in maintenance hemodialysis patients.
Does layer-specific speckle tracking echocardiography detect early changes in left ventricular systolic function and synchrony in maintenance hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control (n=69)
No
Does layer-specific speckle tracking echocardiography detect early changes in left ventricular systolic function and synchrony in maintenance hemodialysis patients compared to healthy controls?
Absolute Event Rate: -15.07% vs -20.55%
p-value: p=<0.001
Layer-specific speckle tracking echocardiography can detect early subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction and dyssynchrony in maintenance hemodialysis patients despite preserved LVEF.
Layer-specific strain may detect subclinical LV dysfunction in hemodialysis; leaves open whether it improves risk stratification or outcomes.
Background: This study investigated the value of layer-specific strain analysis by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) for evaluating left ventricular (LV) systolic function and synchrony in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Methods: A total of 34 MHD patients and 35 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. Dynamic images were collected at the LV apical long-axis, the four- and two- chamber, and the LV short-axis views at the basal, middle, apical segments. The layer-specific speckle tracking (LST) was used to analyze the longitudinal strain (LS) and circumferential strain (CS) of LV sub-endocardium, mid-myocardium, sub-epicardium, global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), the LV 17 segment time to peak LS (TTP), the peak strain dispersion (PSD). The differences in these parameters were compared between control and MHD, and the correlation between PSD and each LS parameter was examined. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to evaluate the efficacy of three myocardial layer LS and CS in the assessment of LV systolic dysfunction in MHD. Results: MHD had comparable left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but significantly smaller GLS, GCS, and three-layer LS and CS compared to the control. The three layer LS of the basal segment, middle segment, and apex segment was significantly reduced in the MHD compared to the normal, while the three myocardial layer CS of the basal segment, middle segment, and apex segment was significantly reduced in the MHD compared to the normal, except for the sub-endocardium of middle and apex segment. MHD had significantly higher TTP of LV 17 segments and PSD compared to controls, and had delayed peak time in most segments. In addition, PSD of MHD was positively correlated with sub-endocardial and mid-myocardial LS and GLS, but not with sub-epicardial LS. The area under the curves (AUCs) of sub-endocardial, mid-myocardial, and sub-epicardial LS in MHD were 0.894, 0.852, and 0.870, respectively; the AUCs of sub-epicardial, mid-myocardial, and sub-endocardial CS were 0.852, 0.837, and 0.669, respectively. Conclusion: LST may detect the early changes of all three-layer LS and CS and PSD in MHD, and is a valuable tool to diagnose LV systolic dysfunction in MHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in End stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis (n=69). Maintenance hemodialysis vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p=<0.001). Maintenance hemodialysis patients had significantly reduced global longitudinal strain (-15.07% vs -20.55%, p<0.001) and increased peak strain dispersion compared to healthy controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: