Key result
Baseline endothelial dysfunction is linked to ~91% higher 5-year cardiovascular event risk after AF ablation.
Why the study?
The utility of endothelial dysfunction as a prognostic marker supplementary to the CHA2DS2-VASc score after AF ablation was unclear.
Does baseline endothelial dysfunction predict cardiovascular events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation?
Cohort (n=1,040)
No
Does baseline endothelial dysfunction predict cardiovascular events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation?
Assessing baseline endothelial function with RHI provides independent prognostic value and enhances risk stratification for cardiovascular events post-ablation beyond the standard CHA2DS2-VASc score.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid post-ablation risk stratification beyond CHA2DS2-VASc; leaves open whether targeting endothelial dysfunction improves outcomes.
Background Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is associated with cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the utility of ED as a prognostic marker after AF ablation supplementary to the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ED and 5‐year cardiovascular events in patients undergoing AF ablation. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients who underwent a first‐time AF ablation and for whom the endothelial function was assessed by the peripheral vascular reactive hyperemia index (RHI) before ablation. We defined ED as an RHI of <2.1. Cardiovascular events included strokes, heart failure requiring hospitalization, arteriosclerotic disease requiring treatment, venous thromboses, and ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death. We compared the 5‐year incidence of cardiovascular events after AF ablation between those with and without ED. Among the 1040 patients who were enrolled, 829 (79.7%) had ED, and the RHI value was found to be associated with the CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score ( P =0.004). The 5‐year incidence of cardiovascular events was higher among patients with ED than those without ED (98 [11.8%] versus 13 [6.2%]; log‐rank P =0.014). We found ED to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular events after AF ablation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91 [95% CI, 1.04–3.50]; P =0.036) along with a CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score of ≥2 (≥3 for women) (HR, 3.68 [95% CI, 1.89–7.15]; P <0.001). Conclusions The prevalence of ED among patients with AF was high. Assessing the endothelial function could enable the risk stratification of cardiovascular events after AF ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okawa et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time ablation (n=1,040). Endothelial dysfunction (RHI < 2.1) vs. No endothelial dysfunction (RHI ≥ 2.1) was evaluated on First cardiovascular event (stroke, heart failure requiring hospitalization, arteriosclerotic disease requiring treatment, venous thrombosis, or ventricular arrhythmia/sudden cardiac death) (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.04-3.50, p=0.036). Baseline endothelial dysfunction was an independent predictor of 5-year cardiovascular events after atrial fibrillation ablation, increasing the risk by 91% (HR 1.91, p=0.036).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: