Key result
Lipid-rich plaques linked to ~11-point lower prevalence of low wall shear stress vs fibrocalcific plaques.
Why the study?
Scaffold design and plaque characteristics influence implantation outcomes and local flow dynamics, motivating an assessment of how strut embedment affects local shear stress across plaque types.
Does underlying plaque composition influence strut embedment and wall shear stress after bioresorbable scaffold implantation?
Observational (n=14)
Does underlying plaque composition influence strut embedment and wall shear stress after bioresorbable scaffold implantation?
Plaque composition significantly influences bioresorbable scaffold strut embedment and local wall shear stress, with deeper embedment and higher shear stress in lipid-rich fibroatheromas compared to fibrocalcific plaques.
Should not yet change BVS deployment by plaque type; hypothesis-generating for trials linking embedment and WSS to outcomes.
AIMS: Scaffold design and plaque characteristics influence implantation outcomes and local flow dynamics in treated coronary segments. Our aim is to assess the impact of strut embedment/protrusion of bioresorbable scaffold on local shear stress distribution in different atherosclerotic plaque types. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifteen Absorb everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds were implanted in human epicardial coronary arteries. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed post-scaffold implantation and strut embedment/protrusion were analysed using a dedicated software. OCT data were fused with angiography to reconstruct 3D coronary anatomy. Blood flow simulation was performed and wall shear stress (WSS) was estimated in each scaffolded surface and the relationship between strut embedment/protrusion and WSS was evaluated. There were 9083 struts analysed. Ninety-seven percent of the struts (n = 8840) were well-apposed and 243 (3%) were malapposed. At cross-section level (n = 1289), strut embedment was significantly increased in fibroatheromatous plaques (76 ± 48 µm) and decreased in fibrocalcific plaques (35 ± 52 µm). Compatible with strut embedment, WSS was significantly higher in lipid-rich fibroatheromatous plaques (1.50 ± 0.81 Pa), whereas significantly decreased in fibrocalcified plaques (1.05 ± 0.91 Pa). After categorization of WSS as low (<1.0 Pa) and normal/high WSS (≥1.0 Pa), the percent of low WSS in the plaque subgroups were 30.1%, 31.1%, 25.4%, and 36.2% for non-diseased vessel wall, fibrous plaque, fibroatheromatous plaque, and fibrocalcific plaque, respectively (P-overall < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The composition of the underlying plaque influences strut embedment which seems to have effect on WSS. The struts deeply embedded in lipid-rich fibroatheromas plaques resulted in higher WSS compared with the other plaque types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torii et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=14). Underlying plaque composition (fibroatheromatous) vs. Fibrocalcific, fibrous, or non-diseased vessel wall was evaluated on Proportion of cross-sections with low wall shear stress (<1.0 Pa) (p=<0.001). Lipid-rich fibroatheromatous plaques allowed deeper scaffold strut embedment and were associated with a lower prevalence of low wall shear stress (25.4%) compared to fibrocalcific plaques (36.2%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: