Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper draws on a Research-Practice Partnership in which we introduced organizational routines (ORs) involving co-design and co-reflection cycles for teachers and coaches to integrate computational thinking (CT) into math and science instruction.Using thematic analysis of educator interviews and class observation notes, we characterize coaches as co-designers and brokers for supporting boundary crossings of integrated CT knowledge and practice within and across schools, and advancing shifts away from techno-centric to learnercentric perspectives on design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: