Key result
Myocardial injury linked to worse outcomes than atherosclerotic MI, with only ~33% 5-year survival.
Why the study?
High-sensitivity cardiac troponins frequently detect elevations without myocardial ischaemia, but no evidence-based strategies exist to guide clinicians in investigating non-ischaemic myocardial injury.
How should clinicians investigate and manage patients presenting with acute or chronic non-ischaemic myocardial injury?
How should clinicians investigate and manage patients presenting with acute or chronic non-ischaemic myocardial injury?
Provides a practical framework for the early assessment and management of non-ischaemic myocardial injury, a condition with poor prognosis but lacking evidence-based guidelines.
Non-ischaemic myocardial injury warrants heightened surveillance; leaves open evidence-based management pending prospective trials.
The application of high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in clinical practice has led to an increase in the recognition of elevated concentrations in patients without myocardial ischaemia. The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction encourages clinicians to classify such patients as having an acute or chronic myocardial injury based on the presence or absence of a rise or a fall in cardiac troponin concentrations. Both conditions may be caused by a variety of cardiac and non-cardiac conditions, and evidence suggests that clinical outcomes are worse than patients with myocardial infarction due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture, with as few as one-third of patients alive at 5 years. Major adverse cardiovascular events are comparable between populations, and up to three-fold higher than healthy individuals. Despite this, no evidence-based strategies exist to guide clinicians in the investigation of non-ischaemic myocardial injury. This review explores the aetiology of myocardial injury and proposes a simple framework to guide clinicians in early assessment to identify those who may benefit from further investigation and treatment for those with cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taggart et al. (2021) conducted a review in Acute and chronic myocardial injury. Acute and chronic myocardial injury was evaluated. Acute and chronic myocardial injury are associated with worse clinical outcomes than myocardial infarction due to atherosclerotic plaque rupture, with as few as one-third of patients alive at 5 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: