Key result
Allometric height indexation reduces body size overcorrection of left atrial volume compared to BSA.
Why the study?
Guidelines propose indexing left atrial volume to body surface area, but this can overcorrect for body size and limited studies have evaluated indexation across different ethnicities.
Does allometric height indexation improve the scaling of left atrial volume across different races compared to body surface area?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,366)
Yes
Does allometric height indexation improve the scaling of left atrial volume across different races compared to body surface area?
Allometric indexation to height 1.72 provides a uniform, race-independent method for scaling left atrial volume in healthy adults, overcoming the body size overcorrection seen with traditional BSA indexation.
BackgroundLeft atrial volume (LAV) has prognostic value. Guidelines propose indexation to body surface area (BSA), however studies demonstrate this can overcorrect for body size. Limited studies investigate indexation across different ethnicities. We sought to evaluate the effect of ethnicity on indexation.MethodsUsing data from the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography (WASE) cohort, healthy subjects were classified by race as White, Black, Asian, or Other. Biplane LAV was indexed to traditional isometric measurements (BSA, height, weight, ideal body weight (IBW) and IBW derived BSA (IBSA)), as well as previously-derived allometric height exponents (2.7 and 1.72). Additionally, an allometric height exponents for our cohort was derived (linear regression of the logarithmic transformation of LAV = a(height)b) as 1.87. All indices were then assessed using Spearman correlation, with a good index retaining correlation of LAV/index to raw LAV (r∼1), while avoiding overcorrection by the index (r∼0).ResultsThere were 1366 subjects (White: 524, Black: 149, Asian: 523, Other: 170; median age 44 years, 653 females (47.8%)). In the entire group, BSA, IBSA, height1.87 and height1.72 performed well with retaining correlation to raw LAV (r > 0.9 for all), and minimising overcorrection to body size, IBSA, (r < 0.1 for all). On race-specific analysis, BSA overcorrected for body size in the White population (r = 0.128). Height1.72 minimised overcorrection for body size in all populations (r ≤ 0.1 for all races).ConclusionDespite a cohort with normal BMI, there was still disparity in LAV indexation with BSA across races. Allometric height indexation, particularly using height1.72, is a possible solution, although further validation studies in BMI extremes are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferkh et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy individuals with normal BMI (n=1,366). Allometric height indexation (height 1.72) vs. Body surface area (BSA) indexation was evaluated on Correlation of indexed left atrial volume to raw left atrial volume and to body size marker (r = 0.023 for height 1.72 vs r = 0.083 for BSA for body size correlation). Allometric height indexation, specifically height 1.72, minimized body size overcorrection while maintaining correlation to left atrial volume across all evaluated races compared to body surface area.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: