Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals diverse representation in hypertension and diabetes trials at FQHCs, indicating improved research inclusivity.
Introduction: Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) serve diverse populations and may enhance participant diversity in clinical trials; however, their engagement in trials remains understudied.The objective of the current study was to examine participant diversity in hypertension and type-2 diabetes (T2D) clinical trials.Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL (Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus for clinical trial of medical interventions addressing hypertension or T2D among adults (≥18), engaging one or multiple FQHCs, and published between 2013 and 2023.We reported pooled proportions of representation of underserved populations in clinical trials.Results: Of 4552 articles identified, 26 clinical trials were included.The pooled proportion was 0.35 (95% CI: 0.26, 0.45) for Hispanic, 0.36 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.48) for Black/African American, 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.05) for Asian, 0.58 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.63) for female, and 0.25 (95% CI: 0.07, 0.43) for uninsured participants, and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.72) for people with limited education (≤High school). Conclusion: Trials involving FQHCs demonstrated high inclusion of historicallyunderrepresented than typical trial populations.This underscores the potential of FQHCs to improve clinical trial representativeness and to enhance the generalizability of research findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barsha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: