Key result
Modified TRI-SCORE with RV-PA uncoupling fails to improve mortality prediction over the original score.
Why the study?
The incremental prognostic value of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial uncoupling within established risk scores like the TRI-SCORE remained unclear in patients undergoing TTVI.
Does a modified TRI-SCORE incorporating RV-PA uncoupling improve prognostic performance compared to the original TRI-SCORE in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions?
Cohort (n=109)
No
Does a modified TRI-SCORE incorporating RV-PA uncoupling improve prognostic performance compared to the original TRI-SCORE in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions?
Odds Ratio: 1.81 (95% CI 1.31–2.49)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Incorporating RV-PA uncoupling into the TRI-SCORE does not improve its prognostic accuracy for mortality or combined clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions.
Background: The TRI-SCORE was developed to predict mortality after tricuspid valve surgery and has demonstrated prognostic value in patients undergoing transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI). Right ventricular–pulmonary arterial (RV–PA) uncoupling assessed by the TAPSE/sPAP ratio has emerged as a prognostic marker in selected populations; however, its incremental value within established risk scores remains unclear. Methods: In this prospective single-centre cohort, 109 patients undergoing TTVI were included. The original TRI-SCORE was calculated for all patients. A modified TRI-SCORE was proposed by substituting the definition of right ventricular dysfunction based on TAPSE with RV–PA uncoupling, defined as TAPSE/sPAP <0.406 using invasively measured systolic pulmonary artery pressure. The endpoints were 12-month all-cause mortality and a combined endpoint of death or cardiovascular rehospitalization. Results: At 12 months, all-cause mortality occurred in 19.3% of patients, and the combined endpoint in 40.4%. Both original and modified TRI-SCOREs were significantly associated with 12-month mortality (OR 1.80 per point increase, 95% CI 1.30–2.48; p < 0.001 and OR 1.81 per point increase, 95% CI 1.31–2.49; p < 0.001, respectively) and demonstrated comparable discrimination (AUC 0.78 for both; DeLong p = 0.90). Furthermore, both scores were significantly associated with the combined endpoint (TRI-SCORE: OR 1.36 per point increase, 95% CI 1.08–1.71; p = 0.008; modified TRI-SCORE; OR of 1.33 per one-point increase, 95% CI 1.07–1.66; p = 0.009) with modest and comparable AUCs (~0.65). Conclusion: In patients undergoing TTVI, replacing TAPSE with RV–PA uncoupling did not improve the prognostic performance of the TRI-SCORE for mortality or combined clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alachkar et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) (n=109). Modified TRI-SCORE (incorporating RV-PA uncoupling) vs. Original TRI-SCORE was evaluated on 12-month all-cause mortality (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.31-2.49, p=< 0.001). The modified TRI-SCORE incorporating RV-PA uncoupling did not improve prognostic performance for 12-month mortality compared to the original score (AUC 0.78 for both; DeLong p = 0.90).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: