Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fieldwork report evaluates woodland boundaries in Jones Hill Wood, suggesting historical management practices.
The Site had already been evaluated by AWH investigation through integrated survey comprising desk-based assessment, a woodland (arboricultural and botanical) survey, a topographic survey and test pit excavation and this formed Phase 1 of the Woodland Evaluation work. The Phase 1 work identified evidence of a woodland bank forming the western edge of the woodland. Further evaluation as part of Phase 2 works was not possible until after tree clearance and a single 20m x 2m trench across the bank was excavated. This trench has provided a relatively small excavation sample area of the Site and was restricted to targeting on a single feature identified in the Phase 1 evaluation work. The results have recorded a previously unknown ditch associated with the woodland bank, marking the western extent of the Jones Hill Wood. The results have not provided a definitive date for the boundary but indicate a date of construction likely no earlier than the later part of the medieval period, although an earlier post-medieval date is also possible. There was no evidence for earlier land used identified. The construction of a woodland boundary can be understood to be a typical management practice associated with medieval or later woods, but the age of the boundary does not necessarily imply an age for the woodland as a whole.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crees et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: