Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores the development of an evaluation index system for electronic archives management systems, suggesting improvements in management practices.
This study focused on the assessment of electronic archive management systems for digital archives. The objective is to address the challenges encountered in archives informatization and archives management systems, while advancing the development of archives informatization and standardization. This study utilizes the Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Method to determine the weighting and combined weighting of indicators across all levels of the assessment index system for electronic archives management systems (EAMS). It is concluded that the evaluation index system should be consistent with the standard system of electronic archive management system of digital archives, as well as the development strategy and status quo of archive informatization construction, which is itself the result of a complex research process involving the intersection of multiple disciplines. The problems with archives informatization and archives management system are addressed, and the development of archives informatization and archives standardization is encouraged by this paper, which has significant theoretical significance for enriching the evaluation system of electronic archives management (EAMS) system of digital archives. This study provides a complete analysis of assessment standards and evaluation research, proposing a novel evaluation index system that encompasses key variables such as condition guarantee, construction and management, quality assurance, and sustainable development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: