Key result
North American immigrant status is linked to ~31% higher diabetes risk versus host populations.
Why the study?
The magnitude of diabetes risk among immigrant populations in North America had not been systematically synthesized.
Does immigrant status increase the risk of diabetes compared to host populations in North America?
Meta-Analysis
Does immigrant status increase the risk of diabetes compared to host populations in North America?
Relative Risk: 1.31 (95% CI 1.1–1.57)
Immigrant populations in North America have an approximately 30% higher risk of diabetes compared with host populations, highlighting the need for targeted prevention and care.
May inform immigrant-focused screening; extends observational disparity data without establishing causality.
Introduction and Objective: Racial and ethnic minority groups in North America experience a disproportionate burden of diabetes. Immigrants represent a distinct subgroup, characterized by migration-related lifestyle and environmental changes that may influence diabetes risk. However, the magnitude of diabetes risk among immigrant populations has not been systematically synthesized. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the relative risk of diabetes among immigrant populations in the US and Canada compared with host populations. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via Ovid), and Scopus in October 2025 for studies reporting diabetes prevalence and/or effect estimates (odds ratios [ORs] or relative risks [RRs]) among immigrant groups compared with host populations. ORs were converted to RRs using host population baseline risks to allow for pooling across studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled RRs. Results: Preliminary analyses include 64 of 81 eligible studies (data extraction is ongoing) of which 27 unique studies reported overall sample comparisons. The prevalence of diabetes among immigrants ranged from 2.1% to 44.5% (n=25 studies). Compared with host populations, the pooled RR for overall diabetes was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.10-1.57) (n=15 studies). In subgroup analyses, the pooled RR for type 2 diabetes (n=9 studies) was 1.32 (1.02-1.71), while the RR for gestational diabetes (n=6 studies) was 1.31 (1.02-1.69). Significant heterogeneity was observed across all analyses (I²=87-96%), reflecting diversity in immigrant origins, host comparison groups, and study methodologies. Conclusion: Immigrant populations in North America experience a disproportionate burden of diabetes, with an approximately 30% higher risk compared with host populations. These findings highlight the need for improved surveillance of migrant health to inform diabetes prevention, policy, and care. Disclosure N.A. Kassaw: None. A. Shrestha: None. I.L. Veloso: None. K. Meeks: None. Funding National Institutes of Health (DK131018)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KASSAW et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Diabetes. Immigrant status vs. Host populations was evaluated on Overall diabetes (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.57). Immigrant populations in North America have a significantly higher risk of overall diabetes compared with host populations (RR 1.31; 95% CI 1.10-1.57).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: