Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 7, 2026Nanotechnology ReviewsOpen Access

Optimization of hybrid nanofluid systems for electromagnetic industrial applications: a comparative study with mono-nanofluid Al 2 O 3 /ethyleneglycol

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MRMuhammad RamzanMHMuhammad HamzahUFUnai Fernández‐Gamiz

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Comparative study assesses heat transfer in hybrid versus mono-nanofluids, indicating significant advantages.

Key Points

  • This investigation aims to evaluate the flow behavior and heat transfer capabilities of hybrid nanofluids compared to mononanofluids.
  • Analyzed magnetohydrodynamic flow of Cu–Al2O3/ethylene glycol hybrid nanofluid.
  • Transformed partial differential equations into ordinary differential equations and solved numerically using MATLAB's bvp-4c algorithm.
  • Validated solutions against existing data for computational accuracy.
  • Hybrid nanofluid showed 18–23% higher heat transfer rates than mono-nanofluid.
  • Nusselt number for hybrid increased by 21.4% as the magnetic parameter rose from 0.5 to 2.0.
  • Hybrid nanofluid exhibited a 27% higher skin friction coefficient than mono-nanofluid as the curvature parameter increased.

Cite This Study

Ramzan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250be87def13d035e1bf09https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2025-0275
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Computational assessment of hybrid nanofluid flow with the influence of hall current and chemical reaction over a slender stretching surface2022 · 146 citations
  2. 2HALL EFFECTS ON MHD PERISTALTIC FLOW OF JEFFREY FLUID THROUGH POROUS MEDIUM IN A VERTICAL STRATUM2018 · 196 citations
  3. 3Numerical analysis of heat transfer in Ellis hybrid nanofluid flow subject to a stretching cylinder2023 · 104 citations