This article addresses challenges in clinical affirmation, promoting a non-clinical approach to nurture bilateral relationships.
Authentic human encounter must include matters of the heart to encompass the full holistic reality of the person. The Catholic psychiatrist Conrad Baars positioned affirmation-based therapy as a clinical treatment for the human need for affirmation. However, attempting to treat matters of the heart in a clinical sense often brings much misunderstanding and error. Counselors and other helping professionals are prone to deal with the subjective nature of a person sentimentally and without reverence for the full objective reality of the person. The purpose of this article is to address issues that emerge in applying affirmation as a clinical technique, and to offer an alternative non-clinical formative approach that allows access to the immaterial and transcendent reality of the person. Four central issues and their remedies are explored: (a) competition between objectivity and subjectivity, (b) the denial of free will, (c) creating a unilateral process that requires another person to act first, and (d) attachment to the counselor. This discussion draws from the metaphysical concept of being as a gift and our free response to be a gift for others. Through this understanding, it is possible to view affirmation as a bilateral process rather than a unilateral one that first requires action from another person. Specific applications are provided to show how formative, non-clinical, human encounters can guide another to a bilateral loving relationship with God as the fullest source of life and affirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Peck (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: