Randomized trial investigates low glycemic load breakfast effects on glycemia in women with GDM, suggesting dietary improvements.
Introduction and Objective: Medical nutrition therapy underpins GDM management, yet evidence-based guidelines are needed. Greater morning insulin resistance often results in post-breakfast hyperglycemia in GDM. A low glycemic load (GL) diet reduces glucose concentrations and need for pharmacotherapy in GDM, but the impact of targeting breakfast only is unknown. In a randomized cross-over trial, we compared the effects of a low vs high GL breakfast (LGL-B vs HGL-B) on breakfast 1-h postprandial glucose (PPG) and 24-h glycemic variability (GV) (primary outcomes) within GDM women. Methods: Women were provided a LGL-B (245 kcal; carbohydrate: 10.9g) and HGL-B (247 kcal; carbohydrate: 43.4g) for 7d separated by a 7d washout. Fasting blood was drawn on day 1 and 7; a masked continuous glucose monitor was worn. PPG and GV (% coefficient of variation [%CV]) were averaged over 7d. Mixed effect models with Bonferroni corrections were conducted to compare between intervention effects within women. Results: Thirty women with diet managed GDM (median 34.5 yrs, BMI 28.1 kg/m2) were randomized (26 wks’ gestation). Compared to HGL-B, LGL-B decreased 1-h PPG (mean 134 mg/dL [95% CI 129, 140] vs 89 mg/dL [84, 94]) and 24-h %CV (19.5 [18.1, 21.0] vs 16.6 [15.2, 18.1]) (both p<0.001). Triglycerides decreased over 7d on LGL-B and increased on HGL-B (time x intervention; p=0.047). There was no difference in ketones, satiety, or acceptability. Conclusion: Within women with GDM, a LGL-B improves breakfast PPG, GV, and potentially triglycerides. This approach may be a simple dietary recommendation to improve glycemia and reduce need for pharmacotherapy in women with GDM. Disclosure J. Burk: None. G.P. Ross: None. S. Colagiuri: None. G.D. Brinkworth: None. P.J. Taylor: None. E.G. Dunn: None. S. Hagen-Lillevik: None. M. Hivert: None. T.L. Hernandez: None. A. Sweeting: None. Funding Sydney Local Health District, Sydney Institute for Women, Children and their Families Seed Funding Grant 2022
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: