Why the study?
Prediabetes classification varies by test, shaping risk profiling and equity monitoring.
Population
11,091 adults aged 18+ without diabetes or pregnancy in NHANES 2005-2016
Comparison
HbA1c-only, FPG-only, OGTT-only, and concordant prediabetes vs normoglycemia
Design
Cross-sectional survey analysis
Key result
Age 75+ and non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity were strongly associated with HbA1c-only prediabetes (aRRR 5.23 and 4.30, respectively), indicating reliance on a single test may miss dysglycemia.
Authors
Loading...
HbA1c-only screening may miss dysglycemia in older and Black adults; hypothesis-generating for equitable multi-test strategies.
Cross-Sectional (n=11,091)
Yes
Relative Risk: 5.23 (95% CI 2.98–9.18)
Discordant prediabetes phenotypes are common and patterned by age and race/ethnicity, suggesting that reliance on a single screening test may miss substantial dysglycemia and exacerbate health inequities.
Fraser et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Prediabetes (n=11,091). Age 75+ years vs. Age 18-54 years was evaluated on HbA1c-only prediabetes (aRRR 5.23, 95% CI 2.98-9.18). Age 75+ and non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity were strongly associated with HbA1c-only prediabetes (aRRR 5.23 and 4.30, respectively), indicating reliance on a single test may miss dysglycemia.