Qualitative study examines family planning challenges in Ghana and suggests solutions for improvement.
Family planning (FP) programs in Ghana have long been shaped by donor-driven priorities and global indicator frameworks that do not always reflect local needs or support national autonomy. This study examines how FP indicators, within donor-influenced systems, create challenges for Ghana’s family planning policy landscape. Using a multi-phase qualitative design, the research draws on a comparative case study of Ghana, Kenya, and Nigeria; an inductively developed analytical framework; a scoping literature review; and stakeholder consultations with representatives from government, donor, and nongovernmental sectors. Findings identify five core challenges, categorized as structural, context-specific, or overlapping, reflecting the multilevel forces shaping FP policy implementation. The study also identifies ten potential solutions from comparable contexts, including regional coordination platforms and rights-based measurement approaches, and assesses their feasibility through stakeholder consultations. These findings contribute to growing scholarship on decolonizing global health metrics and offer a practical framework for policymakers seeking to strengthen domestic ownership, improve data systems, and center autonomy in Ghana’s family planning system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kezia Kennedy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: