Randomized trial demonstrates enhanced reliability and efficiency of a novel PV inverter design, indicating improved energy generation.
Transformerless inverters are increasingly becoming essential in renewable energy generation, particularly for grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) and other sustainable and alternative energy resources. The transformerless designs offer higher efficiency, compact size, and reduced cost compared to traditional inverters with bulky transformers. These inverters minimize energy losses and enable direct connection to the grid by removing the low-frequency transformer. This paper investigates a highly reliable single-phase common-ground inverter for solar panels and other alternative energy generation. The proposed PV inverter has the benefits of existing non-isolated common-ground PV inverters, including direct connection of an input source’s negative terminal to the AC neutral terminal, eliminating leakage ground currents. The inverter is an enhancement of the dual-buck inverter, incorporating one additional diode and a flying capacitor. The dual-buck structure with the inductor inserted between the inverter phase leg prevents short-circuiting. This increases the reliability of the entire power electronics system. Moreover, using external diodes to freewheel the current, the configuration has no reverse recovery issues, allowing power MOSFETs to be employed with safe commutation at higher DC-link voltage and achieve higher efficiency. Summarily, this design prevents short-circuit issues, enhancing reliability and efficiency, and relaxing pulse-width-modulation dead times. The derivation of the PV inverter is carefully analyzed. A 700 W prototype of power converter hardware has been built. The comparative study validates the operational performance, and the grid-connected experiment confirms its theoretical analysis. Experimental results of the hardware prototype are discussed to prove the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed PV inverter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Do et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: