Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates anchorage-induced reflections in prestressed strands, suggesting contact evolution as the key contributor.
Prestressed steel strands transfer structural loads through complex anchorage systems. During through-anchorage ultrasonic guided-wave inspection, strong reflections generated in the anchorage segment may obscure defect-related echoes and create blind zones in the received signals. This study investigates the generation mechanisms of these anchorage-induced reflections and evaluates the relative roles of stress-induced acoustoelastic impedance variation and load-dependent interfacial contact evolution. An acoustoelastic finite element model is first used to estimate the reflection contribution caused by stress concentration alone. The results show that the stress-induced reflection remains weak, with the reflection coefficient remaining below 0.0125 even at 80% of the ultimate tensile strength. A sensitivity-based equivalent spring-contact model is then employed to examine whether effective strand–wedge and wedge–anchorage interfacial stiffness variations can generate anchorage reflections with comparable order of magnitude and load-dependent trends. The contact-based model produces much stronger reflections, and roughness-sensitivity analysis indicates that the load-dependent trend is not governed by a single nominal roughness assumption. Multi-specimen stepwise tensioning experiments show repeatable load-dependent reflection trends at both 80 kHz and 240 kHz. The results therefore suggest that, within the investigated geometry and loading range, interfacial contact evolution is a more plausible dominant contributor to anchorage-induced guided-wave reflections than stress-induced acoustoelastic impedance variation. This work focuses on the physical origin of anchorage reflections and provides a mechanistic basis for interpreting anchorage-induced interference in future through-anchorage defect detection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: