Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To assess the stress state of contact interfaces in bridge anchorage systems, a theoretical model integrating contact mechanics and nonlinear acoustics is developed. Based on one-dimensional longitudinal wave scattering theory, an analytical expression for the reflection nonlinear coefficient γ R is derived, incorporating first- and second-order interface stiffnesses K 1 and K 2 . An ellipsoidal asperity multi-stage contact model is introduced as a physically based complement to the power-law model, which is concise but relies on empirical stiffness–pressure fitting. Laboratory graded tensioning and ultrasonic tests on a single-strand anchorage system, together with field tensioning and ultrasonic tests on a multi-strand anchorage system, validate the model. Results show that reflection nonlinear coefficient γ R increases monotonically with contact stress P , reflecting interface compaction and stiffness enhancement. The power-law model is convenient within a calibrated pressure range, but its accuracy depends on fitted parameters C and m and does not explicitly encode surface topography or material properties, limiting extrapolation. The proposed model derives the stiffness–stress relationship from rough-surface topography and material parameters, reducing empirical fitting. In the laboratory single-strand anchorage test, the acoustic characterization model based on the contact model gives a coefficient of determination of 0.9460 for reflection nonlinear coefficient γ R . In the field multi-strand anchorage test, the relative error between the predicted and measured contact stresses is 8.49%. These results confirm the field applicability and engineering reliability of the model for quantitative stress evaluation of anchorage interfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: