Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction and Objective: In vivo modeling is essential to capture the dysregulated multicellular circuits driving DKD, but is limited by low throughput discovery. To identify causal drivers of DKD, we developed a multiplexed, in vivo pooled perturbation approach targeting tubular epithelial cells combined with single cell/nucleus RNAseq to link genetic perturbations to disease pathology. Methods: 12 individual single stranded (ss) AAV serotypes were packaged with barcoded DNA pools under pol3 promoter expressing a fluorescent reporter (ITR-Promoter-mGreenLantern-Sv40(polyA)-Pol3-Barcode-ITR) and pooled equimolarly. This library was administered IV into hamsters with insulin resistance or a rat model of 5/6 nephrectomy. Two weeks post-injection, GFP-positive nuclei were isolated and analyzed via snRNA-seq to map viral uptake to specific kidney cell types. Results: We identified three serotypes, AAV-KP1, AAV-DJ, and AAV-DJ9 that preferentially transduced proximal tubule epithelial cells (PTEC), specifically the injury vulnerable S3 segment (PT-S3). Notably, AAV-DJ and AAVD-J9 demonstrated ~7-fold higher selectivity for PTECs compared to AAV-KP1, a commonly used serotype previously validated in literature to target PTECs using localized delivery. Conversely, AAV-KP1 barcodes were significantly enriched in endothelial cells, a tropism not observed with other serotypes. Conclusion: In conclusion, our multiplexed RNA-barcoded screening platform successfully identifies serotypes that preferentially target and express in epithelial and/or endothelial cells, active drivers of kidney disease progression. These findings provide a critical toolbox for future high-throughput perturbation screens, enabling the interrogation of causal relationships between genetic signatures and DKD progression in vivo at scale. Disclosure G. Pharaoh: None. J. Nonora: None. D. Shao: None. C. Le: None. A. Gupta: None. C. Carrico: None. J. Chen: None. S. Shambhu: None. I. Driver: Stock/Shareholder; Current; AbbVie Inc., Amgen Inc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
PHARAOH et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: