Why the study?
Dense spontaneous echo contrast or thrombi in the left atrial appendage are common in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, but the role of left atrial appendage asynchrony and its association with dense spontaneous echo contrast formation remain unclear.
Is left atrial appendage asynchrony associated with dense spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Is left atrial appendage asynchrony associated with dense spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Left atrial appendage asynchrony and prolonged longitudinal strain peak time are associated with dense spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, highlighting a mechanical mechanism for potential thrombus formation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LAA asynchrony may flag higher thrombus risk in nonvalvular AF; leaves open whether targeting it improves outcomes.
Left atrial appendage thrombi (LAAT) or dense spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) is relatively common observed on transesophageal echocardiograph (TEE) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who need strengthen anticoagulation therapy before cardioversion or radiofrequency ablation. Nevertheless, little is known about the meaning of left atrial appendage (LAA) asynchrony and its possible associations with the formation of dense left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast (LAASEC). We aimed to analyze LAA global longitudinal strain (LAAGLS) and LAA mechanical function, namely mean peak atrial longitudinal strain (mPALS) and synchrony; we also sought to examine their possible relationship with LAASEC development. Methods: A retrospective study of 360 patients with NVAF was conducted. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography provides the following metrics of LAA strain: LAA strain divided the LAA wall longitudinally into six segments. Moreover, we measured the mean of peaks derived from segmental strain curves (mPALS). The LAA asynchrony was evaluated using the standard deviation of the time to positive peak longitudinal systolic strain for each of the left atrial appendage segments that were normalized to the R-R interval. Results: Patients with dense LAASEC had older age (66.43 ± 8.23 vs 62.28 ± 10.82, P = 0.002), more females (53.1% vs 36.2%, P = 0.009), more per-AF (87.2% vs 44.3%, P < 0.001), more diabetes and heart failure (26% vs 10.3%,25% vs 4.6%, both P < 0.05). The presentation on compliance dysfunction in dense LAASEC group was significant (5.40 ± 2.82 vs 12.40 ± 7.30), and higher PSD LAA (4Segments) (93.44(47.41 ~ 153.35) vs 59.00(13.71 ~ 115.25)) in dense SEC group, especially the peak time of longitudinal strain is obviously prolonged in the middle and apex segments of the left atrial appendage ( 102.50 (20.00 ~ 200.75) vs 23.00 (0.00 ~ 153.00), 19.00 (0.00 ~ 76.25) vs 0.00 (0.00 ~ 19.00), P < 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: NVAF patients with LAA Asynchrony have an increased dense LAASEC. Especially the peak time of longitudinal strain is obviously prolonged in the middle of LAA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: