Key result
Higher left atrial appendage mechanical dispersion was independently associated with an increased risk of left atrial appendage dense spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation (OR 1.24).
Why the study?
The relationship between left atrial appendage mechanical dispersion and left atrial appendage dense spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus, and its usefulness compared to left atrial mechanical dispersion or strain parameters in atrial fibrillation, was unclear.
Does LAA mechanical dispersion assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography predict LAA dense spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=493)
Yes
Does LAA mechanical dispersion assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography predict LAA dense spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Odds Ratio: 1.24 (95% CI 1.14–1.35)
p-value: p=<0.01
LAA mechanical dispersion assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography is an independent predictor of LAA stasis and thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation, offering superior diagnostic value compared to LA mechanical dispersion.
Hypothesis-generating for LAA dispersion in AF; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Aims We sought to investigate the relationship of left atrial appendage (LAA) mechanical dispersion (MD) with LAA dense spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) or thrombus, and to compare its usefulness in the identification of thrombogenesis with left atrial (LA) MD or LA/LAA strain parameters in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of 493 consecutive patients with AF [65(58.5–71.0) years, male 66.9%] who underwent echocardiography prior to catheter ablation. We measured the LAA and LA global longitudinal strain (GLS) using speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE). LAA MD and LA MD was defined as the standard deviation (SD) of time to peak positive strain corrected by the R-R interval. Results Patients with LAA dense SEC/thrombus ( n = 70) had significantly higher LAA MD than controls ( n = 423) [median 14.2(11.6–16.8)% vs 9.4(6.2–12.1)%, p < 0.01]. Multivariable analysis showed that LAA MD was independently associated with LAA dense SEC/thrombus in four different models (Odds ratio, 1.23–1.24; p < 0.01), and provided additional diagnostic value over clinical and standard echocardiographic parameters. Whereas, LA MD was not independently associated with LAA dense SEC/thrombus and had no incremental value over other LA/LAA mechanical parameters. Conclusion LAA mechanical dispersion was an independent determinant of LAA dense SEC/thrombus in AF patients, incremental to conventional risk factors and superior to LA mechanical dispersion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial Fibrillation (n=493). Left atrial appendage mechanical dispersion vs. Lower left atrial appendage mechanical dispersion was evaluated on Left atrial appendage dense spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.35, p=<0.01). Higher left atrial appendage mechanical dispersion was independently associated with an increased risk of left atrial appendage dense spontaneous echo contrast or thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation (OR 1.24).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: