Key result
Holter-derived mean heart rate > 100 bpm was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to < 70 bpm (31.3% vs 4.8%; P=0.023) in patients with acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Heart rate is a key marker of autonomic and hemodynamic stress in acute heart failure, but whether 24-h Holter-derived mean heart rate provides incremental prognostic value for short-term clinical outcomes during hospitalization remains unclear.
Does Holter-derived mean heart rate predict short-term clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure?
Cohort (n=94)
Outcome assessor blinded
No
Does Holter-derived mean heart rate predict short-term clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 31.3% vs 4.8%
p-value: p=0.023
Holter-derived mean heart rate > 100 bpm is a robust predictor of in-hospital mortality in acute heart failure, outperforming single-time admission heart rate measurements.
May support Holter-based risk stratification in acute HF; leaves open whether HR control improves outcomes.
Background: Heart rate (HR) is a key marker of autonomic and hemodynamic stress in acute heart failure (AHF). Whether 24-h Holter-derived mean HR provides incremental prognostic value for short-term clinical outcomes during hospitalization remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between Holter-derived mean HR and short-term clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with AHF. Methods: The study enrolled consecutive adults hospitalized with AHF at a tertiary hospital between October 2020 and June 2021. All participants underwent 24-h Holter monitoring during early hospitalization. Mean HR was categorized as < 70, 70–100, or > 100 beats per minute (bpm). Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, and all-cause mortality and readmission at 30, 60, and 90 days post-discharge. Two cardiologists blinded to outcomes interpreted Holter data. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between mean HR categories and short-term clinical outcomes. Results: Ninety-four patients were included (mean age 66 ± 16.2 years; 56.4% female). In-hospital mortality was strongly associated with mean HR (4.8% for < 70 bpm vs. 31.3% for > 100 bpm; P = 0.023). A HR threshold > 100 bpm significantly increased in-hospital mortality (P = 0.012). In contrast, admission HR alone did not predict mortality (P = 0.573). Post-discharge mortality (1.1–4.3%) and readmission rates (5.3–13.8%) did not differ across HR categories. Conclusions: Holter-derived mean HR was a robust predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with AHF, outperforming single-time HR measurements. These findings may have potential relevance to perioperative risk assessment in patients with AHF, although prospective studies including surgical cohorts are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure (AHF) (n=94). Holter-derived mean heart rate > 100 bpm vs. Holter-derived mean heart rate < 70 bpm was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.023). Holter-derived mean heart rate > 100 bpm was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to < 70 bpm (31.3% vs 4.8%; P=0.023) in patients with acute heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: