Why the study?
Self-care practices and the sociodemographic characteristics contributing to them needed to be described among Saudi heart failure patients.
Saudi heart failure patients demonstrated sub-optimal self-care maintenance and monitoring practices, though female gender and education status were associated with better self-care management.
Suboptimal self-care maintenance and monitoring in Saudi HF patients is hypothesis-generating for interventions; leaves open prospective confirmation of gender and education associations.
Objectives: To describe self-care practices among Saudi heart failure (HF) patients and identify sociodemographic characteristics contributing to self-care practices. Methods: A cross-sectional study utilizing the Arabic-language version of the revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI), version 7-2. A convenience sample of 245 people treated for HF at a tertiary heart center in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia were recruited from June to August 2020. Results: Statistical descriptions of SCHFI showed that confidence level was 84%, maintenance level was 67.5%, and monitoring level was 67.2%. Females’ HF management (p=0.023) and confidence (p=0.002) were significantly higher than male participants. In addition, education level and employment status had a significant effect on HF monitoring with a p-value of 0.006 for the 4 employment categories (F=[3,241]=4.06, p=0.008, h²=0.048). The effect size was small to medium for education level and employment status in the abovementioned results. Confidence significantly contributed to explaining all self-care sub-scale scores. Independent variables significantly predicted monitoring subscale scores (R2=0.082, F=[7,237]=3.027, p=0.005). Conclusion: Self-care practices in this study showed higher scores than those reported in international studies. Further studies are warranted to explore everyday self-care needs and challenges among HF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khalid A. Aljohani (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: