Randomized trial assesses solar hydrogen production across Africa, highlighting climate vulnerability and economic impacts.
Africa's immense solar endowment positions the continent as a pivotal hub for green hydrogen production, yet infrastructure investment decisions routinely assume climatic stationarity, ignoring how multi-decadal climate change will progressively degrade solar resources over a project's operational lifetime. This study addresses this critical gap by developing an integrated analytical framework combining weighted ensemble machine learning, climate projections, and climate-adjusted techno-economic analysis to forecast solar-based hydrogen production across fifteen geographically distributed African locations through 2045. Five complementary machine learning and deep learning algorithms were trained on 19 years of meteorological data (2005–2023), with a dynamic inverse-root mean square error (RMSE) weighting scheme selecting the top three performers per location. The ensemble achieves high-fidelity agreement with the physics-based simulation framework and delivers a 92.2% RMSE reduction relative to a deterministic daily-average physics baseline. Under combined warming scenarios, continental mean production declines reach −7.6±3.6% by 2035, escalating to −9.8±3.7% by 2045 and amplifying to −12.77±4.09% under the high-warming pathway. Regional vulnerability is strongly differentiated: East Africa emerges as the most exposed region (−12.9% by 2045 combined), while West Africa exhibits the greatest resilience (−7.4%). Climate-adjusted Levelized Cost of Hydrogen analysis reveals baseline costs of $3.35–$7.10/kg escalating to $3.90–$10.29/kg under the 2045 high-warming scenario, representing increases of +10.7% to +44.9%, with capacity factor confirmed as the dominant economic driver. These findings establish that geographic site selection based on long-term climate stability and cost trajectory is equally critical as technology selection for African green hydrogen infrastructure investment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: