Evaluates dispersion stability of graphene oxide at varying concentrations and sonication times, suggesting optimal conditions for performance enhancement.
Graphene oxide (GO) colloidal dispersions are increasingly utilised as nano-reinforcements in cementitious systems; however, their effectiveness depends on achieving stable exfoliation without excessive ultrasonication-induced structural damage. This study develops a Raman-guided optimisation framework to evaluate the combined influence of GO concentration and sonication duration on nanosheet integrity and dispersion stability. GO suspensions with concentrations of 0.01–0.125 mg/mL were sonicated for 5–20 minutes at 60% amplitude and analysed primarily using Raman spectroscopy, supported by scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), optical microscopy, zeta potential, and dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements. The results show that lower GO concentrations were more susceptible to cavitation-induced defect formation and fragmentation, whereas higher concentrations reduced localised acoustic damage by dissipating ultrasonic energy across a higher nanosheet loading. The optimal dispersion condition was identified at 0.125 mg/mL with 10-minutes sonication, yielding the lowest defect ratio ( D R ≈ 0.51), preserved nanosheet integrity, and effective exfoliation. Prolonged sonication for 20-minutes increased defect formation, indicating a transition from exfoliation-dominant to fragmentation-dominant behaviour. Multi-scale characterisation confirmed wrinkled few-layer GO nanosheets with retained oxygen-bearing functionalities, limited agglomeration, and a stable aqueous colloidal dispersion, supported by ζ ≈ –36 mV and D hyd ≈ 635 nm. These findings establish a Raman-guided approach for tailoring structurally coherent and colloidally stable GO dispersions, providing practical insight into improving dispersion efficiency and reinforcing performance in cementitious composites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anwar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: