Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates dispersion quality and strength of graphene oxide in cementitious materials, suggesting better product selection methods.
Graphene oxide (GO) can improve cementitious materials, but its effectiveness often differs among commercial products even at the same nominal dosage. This study proposes an optical microscopy-based framework for evaluating the initial dispersion quality of commercial GO suspensions before cement mixing. Under fixed slide preparation, imaging, and image-processing conditions, optical microscopy was used as a geometric dispersion-evaluation tool rather than a direct chemical characterization method. Three image-derived features, namely projected boundary richness, coarse-agglomerate fraction, and spatial dispersion uniformity, were integrated into an optical initial dispersion quality index, Dj. The framework was applied to five commercial GO products at a fixed dosage of 0.03 wt% of binder. The Dj-based ranking was Brand 1 > Brand 2 > Brand 3 > Brand 4 > Brand 5, and remained unchanged when the coarse-agglomerate threshold varied from 20 to 100 μm2. Bootstrap resampling confirmed the robustness of the ranking. The 3-day compressive strength increased from 51.1 MPa for the control mixture to 52.6~60.8 MPa for GO-modified mortars, corresponding to enhancement ratios of 3.1~19.2%. The strength-enhancement ranking was identical to the optical dispersion ranking, with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient of ρs = 1.0. The proposed Dj index provides a practical pre-mixing screening tool for comparing commercial GO products before strength testing or detailed physicochemical characterization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: