Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study explores immunization awareness and predictors among caregivers in Umerkot, highlighting barriers.
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the rural areas of Umerkot District, Sindh, Pakistan. Using nonprobability purposive sampling, caregivers (n=103) with at least one child aged 0–23 months were enrolled in face-to-face interviews. A structured, pretested questionnaire was administered in the local language (Sindhi). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regressions. Participants’ mean age was 27.5 ± 7.3 years. The majority of the population was men (64.1%), illiterate (88.3%), Hindu (82.5%), and employed as unskilled laborers (56.3%). Pneumonia (38.8%) and diarrhea (34%) were the most frequently reported childhood diseases, as reported by respondents in face-to-face interviews. Only 25.2% of the participants considered immunization highly effective, whereas 51.5% trusted spiritual healing. Over 90% participants believed that vaccines caused pain, 55.3% believed that vaccination is associated with future male infertility, and 36.9% believed it impairs female fertility. Trust in Lady Health Workers (LHWs) was relatively high, with 65.9% of the children being vaccinated based on LHW recommendations. Chi-square analysis revealed a significant association between education level and awareness of vaccine benefits (χ 2 = 12.45, p = 0.006). Logistic regression indicated that trust in LHWs (OR=4.23, 95% CI: 1.89–9.45) and literacy (OR=2.89, 95% CI: 1.32–6.33) were significant predictors of vaccine uptake. Misinformation, low health literacy, and persistent cultural beliefs are major barriers to immunization in Umerkot, Sindh, Pakistan. Community-based strategies, particularly those that leverage trusted LHWs, are essential for improving vaccine acceptance and coverage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: