An asynchronous e-learning module significantly increased the proportion of internal medicine residents feeling comfortable interpreting ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reports from 22.6% to 84.6%.
Observational (n=88)
No
Does an asynchronous e-learning module improve internal medicine residents' confidence and preparedness in interpreting ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?
An asynchronous e-learning module is feasible and effective at improving internal medicine residents' self-reported confidence and preparedness in interpreting ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
Absolute Event Rate: 84.6% vs 22.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is considered a reference standard for diagnosing hypertension and is recommended for out-of-office blood pressure assessment, yet internal medicine residents receive limited training in its interpretation. We conducted a needs assessment to identify gaps in hypertension and ABPM education and developed an asynchronous e-learning module to address these deficiencies. We then evaluated its impact on residents’ self-reported confidence and preparedness in outpatient hypertension management. We conducted a single-center quality improvement study among internal medicine residents (PGY1-4) at the University of Toronto between July 2024 and January 2026. A baseline needs assessment evaluated prior exposure to ABPM, confidence in interpretation, and preparedness to diagnose hypertension. An e-learning module was developed, consisting of a structured “Five Steps of ABPM Interpretation” framework and case-based learning. A post-intervention survey assessed self-reported confidence, preparedness, and educational value. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize outcomes. Between-group comparisons of categorical outcomes were performed using chi-square tests. Sixty-two residents completed the baseline survey, and 26 completed the module and post-intervention survey 1. At baseline, 56.5% (35/62) reported no prior exposure to ABPM interpretation. Only 22.6% (14/62) felt comfortable interpreting ABPM reports, and 32.3% (20/62) felt prepared to diagnose outpatient hypertension. Following the intervention, 84.6% (22/26) of residents reported feeling comfortable or very comfortable interpreting ABPM, and 92.3% (24/26) reported feeling prepared or very prepared to diagnose hypertension. Learner satisfaction was high, with over 90% of participants reporting that the module was educationally valuable, easy to use, and effective. An asynchronous, case-based e-learning module was feasible, well-received, and associated with higher self-reported confidence and preparedness in ABPM interpretation among internal medicine residents. The observational nature and potential for both response and selection bias limits generalizability of the study.
Stein et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Internal medicine residents (Hypertension education) (n=88). Asynchronous, case-based e-learning module on ABPM interpretation vs. Pre-intervention baseline cohort was evaluated on Self-reported comfort interpreting ABPM reports (p=<0.001). An asynchronous e-learning module significantly increased the proportion of internal medicine residents feeling comfortable interpreting ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reports from 22.6% to 84.6%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: