Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how mindfulness influences compassion in romantic relationships, suggesting self-absorption plays a key role.
Investigations into mindfulness and well-being have increasingly turned toward social outcomes such as compassion. However, research is needed to understand how mindfulness relates to compassion in real-world contexts. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain insufficiently understood, with self-related processes—particularly self-absorption and interdependent self-construal—representing important candidates. To address these gaps, we conducted a preregistered, ten-day diary study with n = 230 adults (M age = 40, SD = 12; 50% female, 49% male, and 1% N/A) in heterosexual romantic relationships (M length of relationship = 15 years, SD = 11 years; n = 114 dyads with both members contributing). Partner ratings of compassion were collected to capture how mindfulness relates to a person’s compassion as perceived by close others in everyday life. We found that distinct facets of mindfulness showed different associations with compassion across levels of analysis: within persons, daily state increases in mindful acceptance corresponded with higher compassion ( B = 0.19, SE = 0.06, p = 0.002, 95% CI[0.07, 0.31]), whereas between persons, greater trait mindful attention predicted greater compassion ( B = 0.52, SE = 0.17, p = 0.002, 95% CI[0.19, 0.85]). We also found support for self-absorption as a mediating mechanism, as greater mindfulness (state and trait) was associated with more compassion through lower self-absorption. Although we expected this indirect effect to be stronger among individuals higher in interdependent self-construal, this moderation was not supported. Together, these findings highlight the importance of distinguishing state and trait processes in understanding the link between mindfulness and compassion in real-world contexts, and identify self-absorption as a key mechanism. Future work can address limitations of this work by investigating its generalizability to other populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waclawek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: