Key result
Systematic review identifies genetic loci and multi-omic features linked to extracellular matrix dysregulation in SCAD.
Why the study?
The biological underpinnings of SCAD remain incompletely understood, and clinical management is largely based on observational evidence rather than mechanistic insight.
Systematic Review (n=16)
SCAD is characterized by a complex multi-layered biological architecture involving genetic susceptibility and extracellular matrix dysregulation, providing novel insights into disease mechanisms and potential targets for precision medicine.
May inform future SCAD risk models; extends GWAS signals on matrix integrity but leaves therapeutic translation open.
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a major cause of myocardial infarction in young women without traditional cardiovascular risk factors (Hayes et al., 2018; Adlam et al., 2018 [1, 2]). Despite growing awareness, its biological underpinnings remain incompletely understood, and clinical management is largely based on observational evidence rather than mechanistic insight (Saw et al., 2014; Lettieri et al., 2015; Steg et al., 2024 [3-5]). OBJECTIVES: To systematically integrate genomic, epitranscriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data in order to characterize the multi-omic architecture of SCAD and identify potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement (Arbelo et al., 2023 [6]). PubMed/MEDLINE was searched for original studies investigating genomic and multi-omic features of SCAD. Data were extracted on study design, patient characteristics, identified variants, circulating biomarkers, and implicated biological pathways. Functional enrichment analysis was performed using the DAVID bioinformatics resource (Page et al., 2021 [7]). RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were included. Genome-wide association studies consistently identified susceptibility loci related to arterial structure and extracellular matrix integrity, including ADAMTSL4, PHACTR1/EDN1, LRP1, and FBN1 (Huang et al., 2009; Saw et al., 2020; Turley et al., 2020 [8-10]). Rare variant analyses further supported the role of genes involved in extracellular matrix remodeling and vascular smooth muscle cell function, including COL3A1, COL4A1/2, SMAD3, and TLN1 (Adlam et al., 2023; Turley et al., 2021, 2019; Carss et al., 2020; Zekavat et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022 [11-16]), while ancestry-specific signals such as TSR1 variants were observed in distinct populations (Turley et al., 2023 [17]). Proteogenomic approaches linked genetic susceptibility loci to circulating proteins involved in matrix remodeling and inflammation, including cathepsin B and ECM1 (Maioli et al., 2010 [18]). Epitranscriptomic analyses identified differential microRNA expression profiles associated with vascular injury and repair pathways (Sun et al., 2019 [19]). CONCLUSIONS: SCAD is characterized by a complex, multi-layered biological architecture involving genetic susceptibility, extracellular matrix dysregulation, and vascular signaling pathways. Integration of multi-omic data provides novel insights into disease mechanisms and highlights potential biomarkers and targets for precision medicine approaches in SCAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russo et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) (n=16). Genomic and multi-omic features was evaluated on Identified variants, circulating biomarkers, and implicated biological pathways. A systematic review of 16 studies identified genetic susceptibility loci and multi-omic features related to extracellular matrix dysregulation and vascular signaling pathways in SCAD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: