Key result
Smartwatch ECG tracing showed almost perfect agreement (kappa = 0.96) with conventional 12-lead ECG in patients with acute ischemic heart disease, leading to similar medical management.
Why the study?
Smartwatches have become a widely used tool for health self-care, but their role in ischemic heart disease had not been assessed.
Does smartwatch ECG tracing provide comparable diagnostic information to conventional ECG in patients with acute ischemic heart disease?
Observational (n=25)
Does smartwatch ECG tracing provide comparable diagnostic information to conventional ECG in patients with acute ischemic heart disease?
Effect estimate: kappa 0.96
Smartwatch ECGs are highly concordant with conventional ECGs for detecting acute ischemic heart disease, though they may miss inferior infarctions.
May support remote triage in acute ischemia; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Smartwatches have become a widely used tool for health self-care. Its role in ischemic heart disease (IHD) has not been assessed. Objetcive: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of smartwatch ECG registry in IHD. METHODS: We present an observational study of 25 consecutive patients with acute IHD. Conventional ECG and smartwatch tracing were obtained simultaneously at admission. Waves of conventional and smartwatch ECGs were objectively compared. A survey on medical attitude was conducted among 12 physicians (3 cardiologists, 3 intensivists, 3 emergency physicians, and 3 general practitioners) and a score (1-5) of concordance between the records was requested. RESULTS: There were no differences in Q-wave, R-wave, ST segment, or T-wave. There was a very strong correlation between ST segments, a strong correlation in Q-waves and R-waves, and a moderate correlation in T-wave measurements. All specialists obtained a high level of agreement (4.45 ± 0.45). Smartwatch tracings would lead to similar management compared to conventional ECG. There were only 6 (2%) discrepant cases due to differences in inferior repolarization, showing an almost perfect agreement (kappa = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with acute IHD, smartwatch ECG tracing is a reliable tool to make the diagnosis and guide appropriate medical care. However, due to their intrinsic limitations, inferior myocardial infarctions may be missed and require a conventional 12-lead ECG to rule them out.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suárez et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic heart disease (n=25). Smartwatch ECG tracing vs. Conventional 12-lead ECG was evaluated on Concordance between smartwatch and conventional ECG records (kappa 0.96). Smartwatch ECG tracing showed almost perfect agreement (kappa = 0.96) with conventional 12-lead ECG in patients with acute ischemic heart disease, leading to similar medical management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: