Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate intraoperative complications during capsulorhexis and phacoemulsification in intumescent white cataracts using 2 ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) techniques. SETTING: Ruhr University Eye Clinic, Bochum, Germany. DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Patients with eyes with intumescent white cataract were recruited and placed in 2 groups. After capsule staining using trypan blue, a central indentation of the anterior lens capsule was created in the eyes in Group 1 using a medium-viscosity OVD (Healon 1.0%) and in the eyes in Group 2 using both medium-viscosity (1.0%) and high-viscosity (2.3%) OVDs. Then a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) was performed. The outcomes measured were the horizontal and vertical diameters of the CCC, the deviation from the target diameter, and intraoperative complications. RESULTS: In Group 1 (21 eyes), deviation from the target CCC diameter occurred in 12 eyes (10 oversized, 2 undersized), and in Group 2 (20 eyes) deviation occurred in 6 eyes (4 oversized, 2 undersized). In Group 1, capsule tears appeared in 2 eyes and in 1 eye, the procedure had to be converted to extracapsular cataract extraction with anterior vitrectomy. In Group 2, there were no capsule tears. CONCLUSION: Using 2 different OVDs and placing the high-viscosity OVD centrally led to safe indentation of the anterior lens capsule and reduced the risk for CCC enlargement and capsule tear during surgery. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hengerer et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: