Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory analysis investigates CAR-T cell outcomes and immune cell types in relapsed large B-cell lymphoma, suggesting implications for treatment.
BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL), yet nearly 40-60% of patients fail to achieve durable responses. The mechanisms underlying interpatient variability in CAR-T expansion and persistence remain incompletely understood. In this exploratory study, we preliminarily investigated the associations between baseline peripheral blood immune subsets, CAR-T expansion kinetics, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 33 patients with R/R LBCL who received CD19/CD22 bispecific chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR2219) at our center. Peripheral blood samples were analyzed by flow cytometry. CAR-T cell expansion was monitored longitudinally, and group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) classified patients into expansion patterns. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Twenty-two patients received tislelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) as maintenance therapy (200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) starting on day 28 after CAR-T infusion. This regimen was not used as prior therapy, bridging therapy, or co-infusion, rather, it was designed to potentially enhance CAR-T persistence after the initial expansion phase. Given the small sample size (n = 33) and the exploratory nature of the analyses, all findings are hypothesis-generating only and require validation in large prospective cohorts. RESULTS: Two distinct CAR-T expansion trajectories were identified: a low-expansion group (Group 1, n = 18) and a high-expansion group (Group 2, n = 15). Compared to Group 1, Group 2 exhibited higher peak expansion (Cmax, p < 0.001), greater total exposure (area under the curve (AUC), p < 0.001), and delayed time to peak (Tmax, 14 days vs. 10 days). Group 2 had higher baseline naive T cells (FDR-adjusted p = 0.024), helper T cells (FDR-adjusted p = 0.006), and CD4/CD8 ratio (FDR-adjusted p = 0.049), and fewer activated regulatory T cells (Tregs) (FDR-adjusted p = 0.018). Higher CD4/CD8 ratio associated with longer PFS (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.73, p = 0.047). In exploratory subgroup analyses, a directional trend toward longer PFS was noted among patients with high baseline PD-1 expression who received PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy, whereas no such trend was observed in those without maintenance. These hypothesis-generating observations require validation in larger prospective cohorts. CONCLUSION: Baseline immune cell composition may associate with CAR-T expansion and outcomes in R/R LBCL. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested that the direction of association between baseline PD-1 expression and PFS may differ according to receipt of PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy (initiated on day 28 post-infusion), though no statistical significance was reached in either subgroup. Current evidence does not support the clinical use of baseline PD-1 expression as a predictive biomarker, and further validation in prospective studies is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: