Key result
Solia S60 lead for LBBAP exhibits late distal conductor failure two years after implant.
Why the study?
Long-term clinical data regarding lead integrity and longevity in left bundle branch area pacing are still lacking, with several case reports highlighting the risk of distal conductor lead failure.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights a potential risk of late distal conductor lead failure with stylet-driven leads used for left bundle branch area pacing.
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become adopted in recent years to achieve improved ventricular synchrony and reduce the risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. It is a potential alternative to standard right ventricular pacing. However, long-term clinical data regarding lead integrity and longevity are still lacking. Several case reports have highlighted the risk of distal conductor lead failure. In this case, we report late distal lead conductor failure with the Solia S60 lead (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) intended for left bundle branch area two years after initial implant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ha et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Left bundle branch area pacing (n=1). Solia S60 lead was evaluated on Late distal lead conductor failure. A Solia S60 lead intended for left bundle branch area pacing experienced late distal conductor failure two years after initial implant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: