Why the study?
LBBAP requires deep septal deployment and a new pacing lead was designed specifically for this purpose, warranting evaluation of its acute and early post-operative clinical performance and safety.
Does the Solia CSP S pacing lead provide successful and safe left bundle branch area pacing in patients with bradycardia or CRT indications?
Does the Solia CSP S pacing lead provide successful and safe left bundle branch area pacing in patients with bradycardia or CRT indications?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel stylet-driven, fixed-helix lead designed for LBBAP demonstrated high acute implantation success (97.4%) and favorable safety at 1 month.
Background/Introduction Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) becomes widely adopted to provide physiologic ventricular pacing. It requires a pacing lead deployed deep in the interventricular septum. A new pacing lead was designed specifically for LBBAP. Purpose This report summarizes acute and early post-operative clinical performance until one month after implantation. Methods The Solia CSP S pacing lead is designed and approved exclusively for LBBAP. It is implanted with both guiding catheter and stylet support. It has a non-retractable helix to reduce elasticity during the screwing. The helix is longer and has a wider pitch than traditional pacing leads. The BIO|MASTER-CSP study is a single-arm, multicentric, international study to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of the lead in patients with an indication for bradycardia or cardiac resynchronization therapy. Patients are followed for one year; this interim report was triggered by the completion of all implantations. Results Of 155 patients (29% female, 76 ± 11 years), 15% had a cardiac resynchronization indication. Acute LBBAP implantation success was 151/155 (97.4%) with confirmed conduction system pacing (CSP) in 81.3% and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) in the remaining 18.7% of patients with LBBAP implantation. In 43% of the cases, the lead was implanted in the first position; the median number of screw attempts was 2 (IQR 1-3) per patient. Mean procedural time measured 56 ± 23 minutes and fluoroscopy duration was 9 ± 7 minutes. Procedure related complications occurred in 3 (1.9%), all of them being septal perforations although without clinical consequences. Helix damage resulting in lead disuse occurred in 5 (3.2%) patients. Paced QRS duration measured 127 ± 24 ms. Sensing amplitudes (8.7 +/- 4.0 mV), pacing thresholds (0.95 +/- 0.53 V) and impedance (649 +/- 91 Ohm) were favourable and remained stable at 1 month follow. One lead dislocated before hospital discharge. At discharge and at 1 month, 97.6 and 95.2% of those with LBBAP at implantation had LBBAP maintained (EHRA criteria). Lead handing was judged advantageous when compared to established leads by 11 of 12 implanters (92%). Conclusions A novel stylet-driven, fixed helix lead, designed for LBBAP, yields high LBBAP implantation success, favourable intraprocedural safety and stable capture at the left bundle branch area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pooter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: