Key result
Temporary leadless LBBP shows feasibility with ~86% freedom from serious adverse events at one month.
Why the study?
Leadless pacemakers currently cannot perform left bundle branch area pacing, limiting their clinical application.
Does a novel helix-based leadless pacemaker with an extended electrode allow safe and effective left bundle branch area pacing in patients with indications for leadless pacemaker implantation?
Does a novel helix-based leadless pacemaker with an extended electrode allow safe and effective left bundle branch area pacing in patients with indications for leadless pacemaker implantation?
A novel helix-based leadless pacemaker with an extended electrode demonstrated acute feasibility and acceptable electrical performance for left bundle branch area pacing in a first-in-human study.
Supports acute feasibility of novel leadless LBBAP in select cases; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background Leadless pacemakers (LPs) are limited by the current inability to perform left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). Objective The purpose of this first-in-human acute feasibility study was to evaluate the safety and performance of a novel helix-based LP with an extended electrode for LBBAP (LP CSP ). Methods After obtaining informed consent, the LP CSP (Aveir CSP LP) was temporarily deployed in patients with indications for LP implantation. The LP CSP was introduced from the right internal jugular (IJ) vein and temporarily implanted deep into the interventricular septum (IVS) under fluoroscopic and intracardiac echocardiographic guidance. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from serious device adverse events (SADEs) within 1 month of the implant procedure. The primary performance endpoints were intraprocedural electrical parameters, including pacing threshold, impedance, and sensed R-wave amplitude. The LP CSP then was removed, and a conventional LP was implanted in the right ventricle using the same IJ access. Results Among 14 enrolled patients (age 69.4 ± 9.9 years, 71% male), the LP CSP was successfully implanted into the IVS in 10 patients. Pacing threshold (1.2 ± 0.6 V at 0.4 ms), R-wave amplitude (10.2 ± 4.1 mV), and impedance (373 ± 56 Ω) were acceptable. LBBAP capture was observed in 5 patients, segmented into direct capture of the left bundle branch (n = 1) and left ventricular septal pacing (n = 4). Deep septal pacing was observed in 3 additional patients. Freedom from SADEs within 1 month of the implant procedure was 85.7%. Conclusion This first-in-human study demonstrated acute successful implantation of the LP CSP with clinically acceptable intraprocedural electrical performance and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reddy et al. (2025) studied Indications for leadless pacemaker implantation (n=14). LP CSP (Aveir CSP LP) was evaluated on Freedom from serious device adverse events (SADEs) within 1 month of the implant procedure. Temporary implantation of a novel leadless pacemaker for left bundle branch area pacing was feasible, with acceptable electrical parameters and 85.7% freedom from serious adverse events at 1 month.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: