Key result
Empagliflozin reduces CV death or HF hospitalization by ~19% regardless of recent volume overload.
Why the study?
It was hypothesized that SGLT2 inhibitors exert diuretic effects contributing to reduced serious heart failure events, especially in patients with fluid retention.
Does empagliflozin reduce the composite risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, regardless of recent volume overload?
RCT (n=3,730)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does empagliflozin reduce the composite risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, regardless of recent volume overload?
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The performance of these two SGLT2 inhibitors was "incredibly consistent" across the their respective trials run in HFrEF patients with and without type 2 diabetes, and the combined evidence base of the two trials makes for "really compelling evidence" of both safety and efficacy that should prompt a change to U.S. practice, with both of these drugs forming a new cornerstone of HFrEF treatment.”
“There is clearly need for education that can help guide physicians who care for HFrEF patients on how to introduce an SGLT2 inhibitor along with the additional, lengthy list of drug classes proven to benefit these patients.”
The clinical benefits of empagliflozin in HFrEF are not primarily mediated by diuresis, as benefits were consistent regardless of baseline volume overload.
BACKGROUND: Investigators have hypothesized that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors exert diuretic effects that contribute to their ability to reduce serious heart failure events, and this action is particularly important in patients with fluid retention. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin on symptoms, health status, and major heart failure outcomes in patients with and without recent volume overload. METHODS: This double-blind randomized trial compared the effects of empagliflozin and placebo in 3,730 patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction, with or without diabetes. Approximately 40% of the patients had volume overload in the 4 weeks before study enrollment. RESULTS: Patients with recent volume overload were more likely to have been hospitalized for heart failure and to have received an intravenous diuretic agent in an outpatient setting in the previous 12 months, and to experience a heart failure event following randomization, even though they were more likely to be treated with high doses of a loop diuretic agent as an outpatient (all p < 0.001). When compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced the composite risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, decreased total hospitalizations for heart failure, and improved health status and functional class. Yet despite the predisposition of patients with recent volume overload to fluid retention, the magnitude of these benefits (even after 1 month of treatment) was not more marked in patients with recent volume overload (interaction p values > 0.05). Changes in body weight, hematocrit, and natriuretic peptides (each potentially indicative of a diuretic action of SGLT2 inhibitors) did not track each other closely in their time course or in individual patients. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, study findings do not support a dominant role of diuresis in mediating the physiological changes or clinical benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors on the course of heart failure in patients with a reduced ejection fraction. (EMPagliflozin outcomE tRial in Patients With chrOnic heaRt Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction [EMPEROR-Reduced]; NCT03057977).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Packer et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and volume overload (n=3,730). Empagliflozin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with recent volume overload (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.99, p=0.035). Empagliflozin reduced the composite risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure in patients with recent volume overload (HR 0.81), with a magnitude of benefit similar to those without recent volume overload (interaction p=0.34).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: