Key result
The CTB-VP8-1 fusion protein elicited higher titers of neutralizing antibodies and conferred higher protective efficacy against rotavirus than VP8-1-CTB or a VP8-1/aluminum hydroxide mixture in mice.
Why the study?
Does fusing rotavirus VP8* to cholera toxin B subunit improve immunogenicity and protective efficacy compared to VP8-1/aluminum hydroxide in a mouse model?
Does fusing rotavirus VP8* to cholera toxin B subunit improve immunogenicity and protective efficacy compared to VP8-1/aluminum hydroxide in a mouse model?
The CTB-VP8-1 fusion protein demonstrates enhanced immunogenicity and protective efficacy in a mouse model, suggesting potential as a recombinant subunit vaccine against rotavirus.
CTB-VP8-1 merits human immunogenicity trials; leaves open translation of mouse protective efficacy to clinical rotavirus vaccines.
In attempts to develop recombinant subunit vaccines against rotavirus disease, it was previously shown that the N-terminal truncated VP8* protein, VP8-1 (aa26-231), is a good vaccine candidate when used for immunization in combination with Freund's adjuvant. However, this protein stimulated only weak immune response when aluminum hydroxide was used as an adjuvant. In this study, the nontoxic B subunit of cholera toxin (CTB) was employed as intra-molecular adjuvant to improve the immunogenicity of VP8-1. Both, the N-terminal and C-terminal fusion proteins, were purified to homogeneity, at which stage they formed pentamers, and showed significantly higher immunogenicity and protective efficacy than a VP8-1/aluminum hydroxide mixture in a mouse model. Compared to VP8-1-CTB, CTB-VP8-1 showed higher binding activity to both, GM1 and the conformation sensitive neutralizing monoclonal antibodies specific to VP8. More importantly, CTB-VP8-1 elicited higher titers of neutralizing antibodies and conferred higher protective efficacy than VP8-1-CTB. Therefore, the protein CTB-VP8-1, with enhanced immunogenicity and immunoprotectivity, could be considered as a viable candidate for further development of an alternative, replication-incompetent, parenterally administered vaccine against rotavirus disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2016) studied Rotavirus disease. CTB-VP8-1 fusion protein vs. VP8-1/aluminum hydroxide mixture and VP8-1-CTB was evaluated on Immunogenicity and protective efficacy. The CTB-VP8-1 fusion protein elicited higher titers of neutralizing antibodies and conferred higher protective efficacy against rotavirus than VP8-1-CTB or a VP8-1/aluminum hydroxide mixture in mice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: