Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In account of many studies (particularly geotechnical for dams build), these canyons are now defined in their relations with the karst hydrosystem : in their hydrological functions, and by the relations with neotectonics, change of base-level, and development of the endokarst. Exceptionally some anse from a collapse processes (breakdown in the karst passages). These news studies give data up the hydromecanical (evorsion) and hydrochemical processes and speed of the incision (maximum m proglacial canyons). The profiles of streams lead from chaotic to graded ; however in some mediterranean canyons travertines dams have blocked the incision. In most cases a turn or a sinuosity is in connection to fracturation and some incised meanders only in table like structures. The cutting of the Pont d'Arc (Ardèche) make a good model of karstic short cut. Many processes infere in the evolution of the cliffs and sides : unloading and gravity (mass-movements, collapses), cut off of the karst tubes and caves ("baumes-porches"), cryoclastism (inherited penglacial forms in North-mediterranean land, particularly frost-pockets and graded sides), weathering, calcrusts (case-hardening) and travertines deposits. On that account, the comparison between Sumidero of Grijalva (Chiapas, Mexico) and the mediterranean canyons is very useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jean Nicod (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: