Randomized trial evaluates a height-diameter model, suggesting improved predictive accuracy in forestry.
Height–diameter models are widely used to estimate tree height from diameter at breast height (DBH) and play a crucial role in forest inventories by reducing fieldwork effort. However, statistical challenges such as nonlinearity, heteroscedasticity, nonnormality, and outliers can compromise model accuracy. To address these issues, this study proposes a generalization of Scolforo’s height‒diameter model (Scolforo, 1998), which incorporates random effects to improve flexibility and fit. With observational data from Eucalyptus urograndis plantations, we present a step-by-step framework for model fitting, inference, and validation. Our approach considers hierarchical structures and variability across stands to improve predictive performance. To rigorously assess model adequacy, we conducted a simulation study under various scenarios, evaluating goodness-of-fit with deviance, randomized quantile residuals, and least-confounded residuals. These diagnostics identify misspecification and enable robust parameter estimation. Additionally, we provide a detailed tutorial (Appendix B) for implementing the model in R that encompasses (i) inference for fixed and random effects, (ii) local influence analysis to detect sensitive observations, and (iii) residual-based diagnostics adapted to mixed models. Our results reveal the adaptability of the model to complex data structures while maintaining interpretability. The proposed framework provides forest researchers a reliable tool for height prediction that combines theoretical rigor and practical applicability. The accompanying R tutorial increases reproducibility and facilitates the integration of the framework into forest inventory workflows.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: