Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Develops models predicting DBH from stump diameter in East Africa, suggesting improved biomass accounting.
Short-rotation plantations (SRPs), including eucalypt woodlots, now constitute an integral component of the afforestation strategies for many tropical nations under the Paris Agreement. However, wildfires and undocumented clear-cutting harvests are common in these plantations, often occurring prior to reliable measurement and recording of stem volume variables, especially the diameter at breast height (DBH referred here as D), a key parameter for forest biomass and carbon scaling. In such scenarios, D can be reconstructed from stump diameter (DS) using allometric equations. However, locally derived equations to relate DS to D (DS–D models) are scarce in East Africa. As a result, forest inventories in the region mostly rely on generic equations whose broad specifications do not adequately capture site-specific disturbances such as fire and rotational clear-cutting. This study developed DS–D models using data from 115 destructively and non-destructively sampled Eucalyptus camaldulensis trees across first-rotation, post-fire, and coppice-regenerated stands in the Kenyan savanna. Generalized additive models, analysis of covariates, and linear mixed-effects models were employed using under-bark (DSuB) and over-bark (DSoB) stump diameters serving as primary predictors. Model validations were through conventional analytical techniques and machine learning-based cross-validation procedures. The results showed negative shift in intercept coefficients in the post-fire plots, with effect sizes and confidence intervals indicating consistent 1–1.5 cm reductions in D relative to undisturbed stands, suggesting variation in bark or wood allocation as a response to a previous fire episode. Models based on DSuB demonstrated greater predictive stability than those based on DSoB across different disturbance conditions. Locally calibrated models improved prediction power by up to 22% with residual error reduction lower by about 30% in fire and clear-cutting disturbed plots, emphasizing the importance of disturbance-sensitive, site-specific models for enhancing biomass and carbon accounting in forest ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Austin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: