Accurate estimation of tree biomass is essential for tropical forest management, climate change mitigation, and REDD+ monitoring. While conventional inventories rely on diameter at breast height (DBH), measurement of DBH is often impractical in dense stands, buttressed stems, or post-harvest contexts. This study evaluates stump diameter (dst, measured at 30 cm above ground) as a complementary proxy for DBH and stem biomass in Acacia auriculiformis , A. mangium , and their hybrid plantations in Bangladesh. We measured a stratified sample of 1,050 trees and destructively sampled 75 individuals for calibration. Fourteen models (linear, ln–ln, polynomial, mixed-effects, and machine learning) were tested using adjusted R 2 , RMSE, AIC, and Durbin–Watson statistics. The parsimonious ln–ln regression performed very well (R 2 > 0.98), with low RMSE, MAE, and high concordance coefficients confirming unbiased predictions under plantation conditions. Biomass models based on stump performed comparably to DBH models, while mixed-effects models reduced bias, particularly for hybrid Acacia. Validation with independent datasets and five-fold cross-validation confirmed unbiased predictions ( p > 0.05) with narrow confidence intervals. Random Forest identified stump diameter as the strongest predictor, while Gradient Boosting showed signs of overfitting. Species-specific carbon stock estimates indicated that hybrid Acacia was the highest-yielding, followed by A. mangium and A. auriculiformis . Carbon estimates are limited to stem biomass only. This study provides a practical tool for rapid biomass assessment and post-harvest carbon accounting. The findings may contribute to climate and biodiversity goals (SDG 13 and SDG 15), though broader policy relevance requires validation across diverse plantation types and ages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: