Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reports cost reductions in UAV logistics planning, suggesting the need for joint optimization methods.
Existing unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) urban logistics planning follows a sequential paradigm—depot siting first, routing second—that embeds a structural information loss. Straight-line distance screening systematically overestimates the feasible service radius of candidate depots, creating a blindzone of depot–demand pairs that appear reachable but prove operationally infeasible under road network distances. We term this range-feasibility blindness and derive its analytical radius Δ=Rmax(α−1)/(2α), where α is the road-to-straight-line distance ratio. Empirical measurement across three Chinese urban districts confirms α∈[1.40,1.52] and blindzone radii exceeding 2.8 km, establishing the phenomenon as a systemic property of high-density urban road geometry. To eliminate this failure by construction, we formulate a feasibility-embedded location–routing mixed-integer linear programme (MILP) that enforces road network range constraints simultaneously with depot opening decisions, making blindzone configurations implicitly inadmissible. A structure-aware Adaptive Large Neighbourhood Search (ALNS) solves the model at practical scales. Benchmark experiments on Dongli District (Tianjin) show cost reductions of 20.6–28.2% over greedy sequential baselines across three demand scenarios, with gains increasing monotonically with instance scale; cross-city experiments in Beijing and Shanghai confirm consistent improvement averaging 11.4% (Chaoyang, Beijing) and 10.2% (Pudong, Shanghai) over greedy initialisation across diverse urban morphologies. These results position joint optimisation as a necessary methodological shift for city-scale UAV infrastructure planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: