Numerical investigation demonstrates effective vibration reduction methods in historic towers, suggesting strategies for cultural heritage protection.
Historic structures near large public gathering areas are increasingly exposed to dynamic loads from human activities, particularly during concerts and similar events. This study presents a numerical investigation of three mitigation strategies to protect the Moletta Tower from crowd-induced vibrations during large-scale events. A detailed finite element model of the Circus Maximus and the tower was developed to incorporate soil–structure interaction, realistic boundary conditions, and dynamic loading scenarios. The proposed strategies are: (1) installation of a Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI) within the tower to reduce structural vibrations; (2) deployment of a temporary foam-based vibration-damping mat to attenuate crowd-induced excitation at the source; and (3) implementation of subsoil barriers to dissipate ground-borne waves reaching the structure. Results indicate that the damping mat achieved the greatest reduction, lowering peak acceleration by up to 60%. Subsoil barriers provided variable performance, reducing vibrations by 15–45% depending on configuration, while the TMDI offered moderate attenuation, decreasing displacement by 10–40%. Each solution presents distinct advantages and limitations regarding feasibility, cost, and effectiveness. These findings provide valuable insights for safeguarding cultural heritage sites against anthropogenic dynamic loads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bali et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: