Key result
Sedentary women self-regulated to a lower exercise intensity to achieve an affective state of good (FS 3) compared with fairly good (FS 1), with both intensities near the ventilatory threshold.
Why the study?
Can sedentary women self-regulate their exercise intensity using the Feeling Scale to experience a specific positive affective state?
Can sedentary women self-regulate their exercise intensity using the Feeling Scale to experience a specific positive affective state?
Sedentary women can effectively use the Feeling Scale to self-regulate exercise intensity to a level that is both pleasant and physiologically beneficial for health and fitness.
May support Feeling Scale-guided pleasant exercise near VT in sedentary women; hypothesis-generating for adherence and outcomes.
INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: It is important that individuals experience a positive affective response during exercise to encourage future behavior. Exercise intensity is a determinant of the affective response. Current research protocols have failed to find the intensity at which all individuals will experience this positive affective response. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether sedentary women could self-regulate their exercise intensity during exercise using the Hardy and Rejeski Feeling Scale (FS) to experience a specific positive affective state and to examine the specific intensities chosen and their consistency over exercise bouts. METHODS: Seventeen sedentary women completed eight 30-min laboratory-based treadmill exercise sessions (two sessions were completed each week). In four consecutive sessions, participants exercised at an intensity they perceived corresponded to an FS value of 1 (fairly good) and the other four sessions at an intensity corresponding to an FS value of 3 (good). Measures of exercise intensity were recorded. RESULTS: Participants exercised at a lower intensity to achieve an affective state of good (FS 3) compared with fairly good (FS 1). Both these intensities lay close to the individual's ventilatory threshold. The selected intensity was consistent across trials with intensity increasing across time to maintain the required affective state. CONCLUSIONS: Sedentary women can regulate intensity using the FS to experience a pleasant affective state, and the intensities chosen are physiologically beneficial for health and fitness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rose et al. (2008) studied Sedentary lifestyle (n=17). Exercise intensity regulation using the Feeling Scale (FS 3) vs. Feeling Scale (FS 1) was evaluated on Exercise intensity. Sedentary women self-regulated to a lower exercise intensity to achieve an affective state of good (FS 3) compared with fairly good (FS 1), with both intensities near the ventilatory threshold.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: