Review highlights energy efficiency and environmental impacts of desalination and carbon capture technologies.
Water scarcity and the urgent need to decarbonize energy systems are two critical global challenges of this century. Conventional thermal and membrane-based desalination remains constrained by high energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and brine discharges. This review provides a system-level synthesis of integrating desalination with power generation and carbon capture and storage (CCS) within co-generation and multi-generation energy frameworks, based on a systematic analysis of peer-reviewed literature from the past two decades using thermodynamic, environmental, and techno-economic metrics. Five thematic areas are examined: (i) operating principles and efficiency limits of major desalination technologies and their waste-heat compatibility; (ii) pre-combustion, post-combustion, and oxy-fuel CCS approaches and their multi-generation suitability; (iii) thermodynamic coupling mechanisms demonstrating up to 2.5 times higher exergy recovery versus standalone configurations; (iv) life-cycle environmental impacts including carbon footprint and brine management; and (v) techno-economic drivers including levelized cost of water and technology readiness levels (TRL 4–9). Key findings show that oxy-fuel multigeneration systems, particularly the Allam cycle and supercritical CO 2 Brayton configurations, achieve 40–86% energy efficiency with near-zero emissions. Solar-assisted CCS-Multi Effect Desalination (MED) integration raises overall efficiency from 28% to 81%, capturing over 1.5 million tonnes of CO 2 annually. Persistent barriers including thermal mismatch, high-temperature scaling, and high capital costs must be addressed for large-scale deployment. A strategic decision-support framework aligning TRL constraints, regional resources, and sustainability targets is introduced, with priority research gaps identified in experimental validation and brine valorization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imteyaz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: