Randomized trial compares patient-reported stool assessments with physician evaluations, suggesting BSFS may be unreliable for IBS monitoring.
Background: The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) is widely used to assess stool consistency and subtype irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods: Post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial comparing patient self-reported BSFS with physician-assessed BSFS. Baseline symptom severity and quality-of-life questionnaires were also collected. Results: Agreement was poor across the 7-point scale (κ=-0.01, p=0.77) and after collapsing into three categories (κ=0.04, p=0.46), with concordance in only 18/64 cases (28%). Symptom severity and quality-of-life scores were similar between concordant and discordant groups. Discussion: Patient-reported BSFS may not reliably reflect stool consistency or overall IBS burden, suggesting caution when using BSFS alone for monitoring or subtyping IBS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: