Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multilevel analysis reveals participant and implementation characteristics affect premarital readiness outcomes.
This study examined the associations between participant- and implementation-level characteristics and two dimensions of premarital readiness, namely, knowledge/skills and behavioral readiness, within the Seoul Premarital Education Program (S-PEP) implemented at Family Centers. Using multilevel modeling, we analyzed data from 170 individuals nested within 15 S-PEP groups delivered via videoconferencing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participant-level characteristics (Level 1) included gender, age, educational attainment, relationship duration, and program satisfaction. Meanwhile, implementation-level characteristics (Level 2) were the number of sessions, group size, manual adherence, and staff job satisfaction. After controlling for pre-test scores, younger age, higher program satisfaction, a greater number of sessions, and higher staff job satisfaction were associated with higher post-program knowledge/skills readiness. Regarding, behavioral readiness, younger age, higher program satisfaction, higher educational attainment, a greater number of sessions, and higher staff job satisfaction were positively associated with post-program behavioral readiness. Interestingly, lower manual adherence was associated with higher post-program behavioral readiness. These findings suggest that cognitiveskill acquisition and behavioral change in premarital contexts may necessitate distinct implementation strategies. Furthermore, the results highlight the critical role of practitioner well-being and suggest that revisiting and refining program manuals may further enhance the effectiveness of premarital interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
김민식 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: